« Older Home
Loading Newer »

The fans are correct, again!


49% of the fans picked Magnus to win the game! They were correct! Only 12% picked the World to win.

Posted by Picasa

Magnus’ chess brilliancy


White to move. How should Magnus proceed?

r1b4r/p3k1p1/1pQbBR1p/8/3P3q/4P3/P5PP/1R4K1 w – - 0 1

Magnus vs. Groenn 2005

Posted by Picasa

The International Appeal of Magnus


Approximately 19,000 chess enthusiasts from almost 120 countries followed my LIVE commentary right here during the Magnus vs. the World game earlier today. This is without any advertisement anywhere else other than with the regular readers of my blog, facebook, and twitter.

This is the highest number for a non-world championship game. The Netherlands led the way, followed by the U.S., Germany, Norway, and France.

The highest number on my site for a single LIVE game commentary is over 140,500 people for the final game of the Anand – Topalov world championship.

Posted by Picasa

Magnus Carlsen vs the World LIVE Commentary


Magnus Carlsen vs. The World

Will it be 1. d4, 1. e4, 1. Nf3, 1. c4, or something else? :) Are you ready?

Less than 30 seconds to go!

1. d4 Nf6 Judit and Vachier-Lagrave voted for 1…Nf6. Technical difficulty with Nakamura’s first move but he finally chose 1…f5.

2. c4 Lagrave and Nakamura voted for 1…g6 but Judit chose 1…e6.

2…g6 The World chose 2…g6 by 51%-49% over 1…e6.

3. Nf3 Magnus quickly played this move.

3…Bg7 was a unanimous choice by all 3 players.

4. g3 Magnus chose to go into a solid continuation. This is a wise idea as he knows that some fans at home are armed with computer software. Therefore, it may not be wise to get into sharp crazy stuff. Lagrave and Judit voted for 4…0-0 while Nakamura chose 4…d6

4…0-0 The World chose this one.

5. Bg2 Now Judit and Nakamura chose 5…d6 while Lagrave suggested 5…c6

5…d6 The World chose the majority choice.

6. Nc3 Judit, Lagrave and Nakamura all took their time suggesting this move.

6…Nc6 7. 0-0 Now Judit recommended 7…e5 while Lagrave and Nakamura chose 7…a6.

7…e5 The World chose to go with Judit’s recommendation over Nakamura and Lagrave! Even though 7…a6 is a more popular choice, 7…e5 may be a better choice against Magnus.

8. d5 Ne7 was a unanimous choice.

9. e4 Lagrave chose 9…Nd7, Nakamura chose 9…c6 and Judit chose 9….Ne8

9…c6 This is not a great choice. 9…Ne8 or 9…Nd7 (played by Ivanchuk vs Kasparov) are both superior choices in my opinion.

10. a4 A surprising choice by Magnus. Judit recommends 10…Ne8, Lagrave 10…a5 and Nakamura 10…Bg4.

10…Bg4 Another unusual choice, quite suspicious. It does not make sense in the normal scope of this opening. Another very surprising choice. The problem with this move is 11.h3 and Black either has to move the Bishop back or trade the Bishop which is not a great idea.

11. a5 Judit and Lagrave chose 11…cxd5 while Nakamura chose 11…Qd7.

11…cxd5 Now the only competent response is 12…cxd5.

12. cxd5 Nakamura and Lagrave chose 12…Qd7 while Judit chose 12…Ne8. I personally prefer 12…Rc8

12…Qd7 Magnus has a decent space advantage for the moment.

13. Be3 A logical move. I do not like Black’s position at all. Black has no real counter attack chances as White’s position is solid. Judit recommends 13…Nh5 while Lagrave and Nakamura chose 13…Rfc8. I like Judit’s recommendation. I believe that 13…Rfc8 is an inferior option.

13…Rfc8 14. Qa4 Exchanging Queens would favor White in the endgame. Judit recommends 14…Qd8 to avoid exchanging Queens while Lagrave recommends 14…Ne8. It seems that Nakamura is taking a time out. This plan recommended by Nakamura does not seem to work out for the World for the moment. Magnus has a strong edge in this endgame.

14…Ne8 White is better in space and piece placement.

15. Nd2 I am very surprised that the World got into a messy inferior position this quickly. Both Lagrave and Judit recommends 15…Qd8 while Nakamura picked 15…Nc7. It seems that the World GMs are quite frustrated at this moment. They know that they are in trouble.

15…Qd8 Now 16. Nc4 basically enhances White’s advantage. 16. Qb4 is also very good.

16. Qb4 Nakamura and Judit recommend 16…Nc7 while Lagrave chose 16…Bd7. 16…Nc7 is bad because Black is completely lost after 17. h3 The problem is the World keep mixing choices between the recommendation of the 3 GMs. This does not work. The World has to pick one plan and go with it. Mixing things up will lead to a disastrous result.

16…Nc7?

17. Nc4? Magnus missed the best move 17. h3!

17….Na6 18. Qxb7 The position is quite lost for the World. Lagrave and Judit recommend 18…Nc5 while Nakamura picked 18…Rxc4.

18…Rxc4 19. Qxa6 Judit and Lagrave chose 19…Rb4. Nakamura is still thinking.

19…Rb4 20. f3 IMHO, 20…Bc8 is the only move.

20…Bc8 21. Qe2 White is still better. A pawn is a pawn. However, the World is lucky to duck 17. h3 which would have given White a decisive advantage. Judit and Nakamura chose 21…f7 while Lagrave picked 21…Qd7.

21…f5 22. Qd2 Now 22…f4 may be the best shot for counter playing chances. Judit and Nakamura recommended 22…Ba6 while Lagrave chose 22…f4. I like 22…f4 a little better.

22…Ba6 Now I would think that Magnus will play 23. Rfc1.

23. Rc1 Judit and Lagrave chose 23…Qd7 while Nakamura picked 23…Qb8. I think 23…Qd7 is a better move to prevent 24. Na4.

23…Qb8 24. Na4 Judit and Lagrave chose 24…Rb3.

24…Rb3 The logical choice for White now is to exchange Rook and simplify the position with 25. Rc3.

25. Rc3 My choice is 25…Rb4. Judit and Nakamura also picked 25…Rb4 while Lagrave chose 25…f4.

25…Rb4 26. Rca3 A very interesting move. White is threatening Nb6! One of the problems for Black is the move 23…Qb8. The other Rook belongs on b8 and not the Queen. Judit and Lagrave recommended 26…f4 while Nakamura chose 26…Rb7. If 26…f4 27. gxf4 exf4 28. Bxf4 Rd4 29. Qc1 +/-

26…f4

Posted by Picasa

Magnus will have White against the World


I just got off the phone with my sister Judit who is on location right now. Don’t forget to follow the LIVE commentary right here (11 am Texas time and 12 pm NY time).

RIP GM Bent Larsen


Bent Larsen passed away yesterday

Denmark’s chess legend Bent Larsen passed away September 9th

Denmark’s greatest chess player ever, Bent Larsen, passed away Thursday evening, the 9th of September.

Danish Chess Union President Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen said for the DSU official website:

Bent Larsen was in a class and a model for an entire generation of chess masters around the world. While he was on top, he won tournaments in front of the world elite, including seven world champions, and he was in his time the only western challenger against Soviet chess domination. His importance to chess in Denmark as a chess player and inspiration is unsurpassed, and his achievements and games will forever be carved into Danish and international chess history.

The Chessdom.com team expresses condolences to Bent Larsen’s family, friends, and chess fan.

More details coming.

Bent Larsen

Jørgen Bent Larsen (4 March 1935 – 9 September 2010) was a Danish chess Grandmaster. He has been a six-time Danish champion, and a Candidate for the World Chess Championship on four occasions: 1965, 1968, 1971, and 1977. He won three Interzonal tournaments: Amsterdam 1964, Sousse 1967, and Biel 1976. Larsen won several dozen major international tournaments during his career, and was awarded the first Chess Oscar in 1967.

Larsen is considered to be the strongest chess player ever born in Denmark, and strongest in Scandinavia at least until the emergence of Magnus Carlsen. Since the early 1970s, he has lived for part of the year in Las Palmas and in Buenos Aires, with his Argentinian-born wife.

Larsen, who was born in Thisted in Denmark, represented Denmark twice in the World Junior Championship, in 1951 at Birmingham (placing fifth), and 1953 at Copenhagen (placing eighth). He never graduated in Civil Engineering, but decided to become a chess professional. He became an International Master at the age of 19 in 1954, from his bronze-medal performance on board one at the Amsterdam Olympiad. He won his first of six Danish Championships in 1954, and repeated in 1955, 1956, 1959, 1963, and 1964.

Larsen defeated Friðrik Ólafsson in an exhibition match at Oslo 1955 by 4.5-3.5. He won at Copenhagen 1956 with 8/9.

Larsen became an International Grandmaster in 1956 with his gold-medal performance on board one at the Moscow Olympiad. He tied for 1st-2nd places at Hastings 1956-57 on 6.5/9 with Svetozar Gligorić. At Dallas 1957, he scored 7.5/14 for a shared 3rd-4th place; the winners were Gligorić and Samuel Reshevsky.

At the 1957 Wageningen Zonal, he tied for 3rd-4th places, along with Jan Hein Donner, with 12.5/17; there were only three qualifying berths, so the two players had to dispute a playoff match. Larsen won by 3-1 over Donner at The Hague 1958 to qualify for his first Interzonal, at Portorož 1958. Larsen could score only 8.5/20 for 16th place, and was not close to qualifying. But he scored his first major individual international success by winning Mar del Plata 1958 with 12/15, ahead of William Lombardy, Erich Eliskases, Oscar Panno, and Herman Pilnik.

Larsen went into a slump beginning with the 1958 Interzonal. He tied 5th-6th in a powerful field at Zurich 1959 with 9.5/15, behind winner Mikhail Tal, Gligorić, Paul Keres, and Bobby Fischer. But Larsen placed only 4th in a middle-range field at the 1960 Berg en Dal Zonal 1960 with 5.5/9, and did not advance to the Interzonal. He recovered by sharing 1st-2nd places at Beverwijk 1961 on 7.5/9 with Borislav Ivkov. At Zurich 1961, he tied for 6th-7th places with 6/11, as Keres won ahead of Tigran Petrosian. At Moscow 1962, he shared 7th-11th places with 7.5/15 (Yuri Averbakh won).

Around this time Larsen diversified his style, switching over to risky and unusual openings in some of his games, to try to throw his opponents off balance; this led to the recovery of his form and further development of his chess. He finished 2nd at the 1963 Halle Zonal with 13/19, behind winner Lajos Portisch, to advance to the Interzonal the next year. At Belgrade 1964, he shared 5th-6th places with 10/17 (Boris Spassky won). He tied for 5th-7th places at Beverwijk 1964 on 9.5/15; Keres and Nei won. Larsen’s unusual openings were on full display at the 1964 Amsterdam Interzonal, where he shared the 1st-4th places on 17/23 with Boris Spassky, Mikhail Tal, and Vasily Smyslov, advancing as a Candidate.

In the 1965 Candidates’ matches, he first defeated Borislav Ivkov at Bled by 5.5-2.5, but lost in the semi-final, also at Bled by 4.5-5.5 to former world champion Mikhail Tal. He won a playoff match for alternates, an eventual third-place Candidates’ position, against Efim Geller by 5-4 at Copenhagen 1966. In 1967 he won the Sousse Interzonal after Fischer withdrew, then won his first-round match against Lajos Portisch by 5.5-4.5 at Porec 1968. In Malmö, however, he lost the semi-final by 2.5-5.5 to Boris Spassky, who went on to win the title.

In 1970 he shared 2nd in the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal, on 15/23, behind Bobby Fischer. He reached his top rank in the Elo rating system at the start of 1971, equal third in the world (with Korchnoi, behind Fischer and Spassky) with a rating of 2660.[1] He then defeated Wolfgang Uhlmann by 5.5-3.5 at Las Palmas 1971. But then he lost the semi-final 0-6 at Denver to Fischer, who also went on to win the title.

Larsen later claimed in a Kasparov.com interview (1998) that his one-sided loss to Fischer was due in part to his condition during the match: “The organizers chose the wrong time for this match. I was languid with the heat and Fischer was better prepared for such exceptional circumstances… I saw chess pieces through a mist and, thus, my level of playing was not good.”

In 1973 he failed to advance from the Leningrad Interzonal; he tied for 5th-6th places with 10/17, with Anatoly Karpov and Viktor Korchnoi winning. In 1976 he won the Biel Interzonal, but lost his 1977 Candidates’ match, a rematch of their 1968 encounter, to Lajos Portisch by 3.5-6.5 at Rotterdam. In the Riga Interzonal of 1979, Larsen scored 10/17 for 7th place, and did not advance.

Starting in the mid-1960s, Larsen enjoyed a very successful run in major tournaments around the world, and he and Fischer became the two strongest players outside the Soviet Union. Larsen played in a lot of strong events, at least as many as any other top player, and repeatedly finished ahead of the top Soviet players. He won at Le Havre 1966 with 9/11, ahead of Lev Polugaevsky. At Santa Monica 1966, he placed third with 10/18, behind Spassky and Fischer. He won at Havana 1967 with a powerful 15/19, ahead of a strong group which included Mark Taimanov, Smyslov, Polugaevsky, Gligoric, and Miroslav Filip. He shared 2nd-3rd places at Dundee 1967 with 5.5/8, behind Gligoric. At Beverwijk 1967, he was 4th with 8.5/15 (Spassky won). At Monte Carlo 1967, he shared 3rd-4th with 6/9, behind Fischer and Efim Geller. He shared 1st-2nd at Winnipeg 1967 with 6/9, along with Klaus Darga, ahead of Spassky and Keres. He won at Palma de Mallorca 1967 with 13/17, ahead of Smyslov, Mikhail Botvinnik, Portisch, Gligoric, and Borislav Ivkov. He was awarded the first Chess Oscar in 1967.

Somewhat unusual for the late 1960s, Larsen, as one of the world’s top players, often entered large Open tournaments run on the Swiss system, and had plenty of success. He won the Canadian Open Chess Championships at Toronto 1968 and St. John’s 1970. He also won the U.S. Open Chess Championships at Aspen 1968 and Boston 1970.

Larsen shared 2nd-3rd places at Palma de Mallorca 1968 with 13/17, along with Spassky; Viktor Korchnoi won. Larsen won at Monte Carlo 1968 with 9.5/13, ahead of Botvinnik, Smyslov, Vlastimil Hort, Robert Byrne, Portisch, and Pal Benko. He defeated Heikki Westerinen by 6-2 in a 1969 exhibition match at Helsinki. In a playoff match for third place in the Candidates Tournament, he defeated Mikhail Tal at Eersel 1969 by 5.5-2.5 in a rematch of their 1965 encounter. He won at Palma de Mallorca 1969 with 12/17 ahead of Petrosian, Korchnoi, Hort, and Spassky. There was a further victory at Buesum 1969 with 11/15 ahead of Polugaevsky. At San Juan 1969, he scored 9/15 for a shared 6th-7th place (Spassky won).

Larsen won at Lugano 1970 with 9.5/14, ahead of Olafsson. In the USSR vs Rest of the World match at Belgrade 1970, he played first board for the World side, ahead of Fischer, and scored 2.5/4 against Spassky and Leonid Stein. At Leiden 1970, he shared 3rd-4th places with 5.5/12, (Spassky won). He defeated Lubomir Kavalek in a 1970 exhibition match at Solingen by 6-2. He won at Vinkovci 1970 with 10.5/15, ahead of David Bronstein, Hort, and Gligoric. At Palma de Mallorca 1970, he shared 6th-7th places with 9/15 (Panno and Ljubomir Ljubojevic were joint winners). Larsen shared 8th-9th places at San Antonio 1972 on 8.5/15 (Portisch, Petrosian, and Anatoly Karpov triumphed). He won at Teesside 1972 with 11/15, ahead of Ljubojevic and Portisch. At Las Palmas 1972, he shared 2nd-3rd places on 11/15 (Portisch won).

Larsen won at Hastings 1972-73 on 11.5/15, ahead of Wolfgang Uhlmann. At Bauang 1973, he scored 6/9 for 4th place (Kavalek won). Larsen won at Grenaa 1973 in the Nordic Championship with 8.5/10. He won again at Manila 1973 with 12.5/15, ahead of Ljubojevic and Kavalek.

He represented Denmark six times in Olympiad play, always on first board, and compiled an aggregate score of 75/109 (+61 =28 -20), for 68.8 per cent, according to olimpbase.org. He always played a very high number of games, almost all of the rounds, and won three board medals, one gold and two bronzes.

* Amsterdam 1954, board one, 13.5/19 (+11 =5 -3), board bronze medal;
* Moscow 1956, board one, 14/18 (+11 =6 -1), board gold medal;
* Munich 1958, board one, 13/19 (+11 =4 -4);
* Havana 1966, board one, 11/18 (+9 =4 -5);
* Lugano 1968, board one, 10.5/18 (+8 =5 -5);
* Siegen 1970, board one, 13/17 (+11 =4 -2), board bronze medal.

In 1988 he lost a game to Deep Thought in the Software Toolworks Championship, becoming the first Grandmaster and the player with the highest Elo rating (by then 2560) to be defeated by a computer in tournament play.

Larsen has continued to play occasionally in tournaments to the present day. In 1999 he finished 7th of 10 in the Danish Championship, but in the 2000 event he was forced to withdraw when he became seriously ill with an edema, requiring brain surgery. He has played in only a few tournaments in Buenos Aires since then. He was 4th in the 2002 Najdorf Memorial knock-out. In the September 2010 FIDE list, he has an Elo rating of 2415.

More about Bent Larsen

Wikipedia / FIDE

The big trio at Corus (now Tata Steel) Chess


Tata Steel Chess 2011
Corus to be renamed Tata Steel

The traditional Corus Chess Tournament in Wijk Aan Zee will have a different name starting next year Tata Steel Chess.

This is the second change of name for the event in their 73 editions history. The traditional tournament has been running since 1938 under the name of Hoogovens, and was renamed later in 2000 Corus.

The format of Tata Steel Chess will be preserved. A total of 3 groups will be present (A, B, and C), with some of the top world players in the A group. Each group will preserve the 14 players round robin format. Until now the tournament reveals 3 names – the current number 1 GM Magnus Carlsen, the World Champion GM Viswanathan Anand, and the 5th in the September FIDE rating list GM Vladimir Kramnik. Interesting to note, these players also participate in the Bilbao Final Chess Masters.

The rest of the field will be announced after the end of the 2010 Chess Olympiad in Khanty Mansiysk.

The rumor of the renaming of the tournament has been around for some time, and was first publicly confirmed after a GSCA meeting talk with journalists. The information is confirmed now by official press release at the Corus website, that from next year will be under the domain name tatasteelchess.com.

Posted by Picasa

Checkmate in 3


White to move and checkmate in 3.

2r2k2/4p3/4Rb2/3Q3p/1p3P2/p6P/1qn1NP1K/6R1 w – - 0 1

Posted by Picasa

5 tie for the lead at Spanish Championship


Leaders after 6 rounds:

Rk.
Name FED RtgI Pts. TB1 TB2 TB3 n w we w-we K rtg+/-
1 GM ARIZMENDI MARTINEZ Julen Luis ESP 2540 5,0 21,5 16,5 24,5 6 5 3,88 1,12 10 11,2
2 GM VALLEJO PONS Francisco ESP 2697 5,0 21,5 16,5 24,0 6 5 4,86 0,14 10 1,4
3 IM MORENO RUIZ Javier ESP 2491 5,0 19,5 15,5 22,5 6 5 4,27 0,73 10 7,3
4 GM MAGEM BADALS Jordi ESP 2589 5,0 18,5 14,0 21,0 6 5 4,52 0,48 10 4,8
5 GM SALGADO LOPEZ Ivan ESP 2595 5,0 18,0 13,5 21,0 6 5 4,81 0,19 10 1,9
6 GM HERRAIZ HIDALGO Herminio ESP 2480 4,5 22,0 17,0 24,5 6 4,5 4,00 0,50 10 5,0
7 GM ILLESCAS CORDOBA Miguel ESP 2591 4,5 21,0 16,5 24,0 6 4,5 4,88 -0,38 10 -3,8
8 IM ALONSO ROSELL Alvar ESP 2485 4,5 21,0 16,0 24,0 6 4,5 3,60 0,90 10 9,0
9 IM PENA GOMEZ Manuel ESP 2421 4,5 19,5 15,0 22,0 6 4,5 3,62 0,88 10 8,8
10 IM RECUERO GUERRA David ESP 2457 4,5 19,5 14,5 22,5 6 4,5 3,77 0,73 10 7,3
11 IM ARGANDONA RIVEIRO Inigo ESP 2408 4,5 19,5 14,5 22,0 6 4,5 4,02 0,48 10 4,8
12 GM SAN SEGUNDO CARRILLO Pablo ESP 2511 4,5 19,0 14,5 22,5 6 4,5 4,55 -0,05 10 -0,5
13 FM SANCHEZ ALLER Fernando ESP 2323 4,5 18,5 14,0 21,0 6 4,5 3,15 1,35 15 20,3
14 IM LARINO NIETO David ESP 2451 4,5 17,5 13,5 20,0 6 4,5 4,92 -0,42 10 -4,2
15 GM TODORCEVIC Miodrag ESP 2434 4,5 17,5 13,0 20,0 6 4,5 5,10 -0,60 10 -6,0
16
FERNANDEZ LOSADA Daniel ESP 2126 4,5 16,0 11,5 17,0 5 3,5 1,60 1,90 15 28,5

Full standings here: http://chess-results.com/Tnr37747.aspx

Posted by Picasa

Kasparov/Crumiller consultation game


Jon Crumiller (left) just played a consultation game in London. His partner was Garry Kasparov and their opponents were Nigel Short and Vujatovic. Here is the game, courtesy of TWIC.

Short, Nigel and Vujatovic (2690) – Kasparov, Garry and Crumiller (2812) [B42]
Staunton Memorial Consultation Game (London, ENG), 08.09.2010

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Bd3 Bc5 6.Nb3 Be7 7.Qg4 g6 8.Qe2 d6 9.0–0 Nd7 10.a4 b6 11.Na3 Qc7 12.Nc4 Bb7 13.a5 b5 14.Nb6 Nxb6 15.axb6 Qxb6 16.Na5 Bc8 17.Be3 Qc7 18.c4 b4 19.e5 Rb8 20.Bd4 f6 21.exf6 Nxf6 22.c5 0–0 23.cxd6 Bxd6 24.Rfc1 Bxh2+ 25.Kh1 Qf4 26.Rxc8 Qxd4 27.Rc4 Qd6 28.Rd1 Kh8 29.g3 Qd5+ 30.Kxh2 Qxa5 31.Qxe6?? Qh5+ 32.Rh4 Qxd1 33.Bxg6 Ng4+ 0–1
 
Click here to replay the game.

Posted by Picasa

Young minds take to the chess board


Young minds take to the chess board
10 Sep, 2010 09:36 AM

The game of chess is very much alive and kicking in the New England.

Arguably, it is one of the most effective teaching tools available to children.

Not only does chess raise intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, it strengthens problem solving skills, teaces how to make difficult and abstract decisions independently and enhances reading, memory, language, and mathematical abilitie.

The Primary Schools one-day chess tournament was again hosted by St Mary’s last Friday.

A record 40 teams battled it out all dy with some very tightly contested matches.

Players came from as far as Emmaville, Ross Hill, Black Mountain, and Inverell.

The day was very pleasant with supervising adults being very impressed with the spirit of sportsmanship displayed.

Here is the full article.

Posted by Picasa

Magnus vs the World poll

Who will win the Magnus Carlsen vs. the World match?
The World
Draw
Magnus Carlsen
G-Star and all the publicity they receive
Liv Tyler
The chess community

pollcode.com free polls

Middlegame chess tactic


White to move. What is the most accurate continuation for White?

2r2rk1/5pbp/1q2pnp1/1pNp4/pP1Pn1b1/P4NP1/1B2PPBP/2RQ1RK1 w – - 0 16

Posted by Picasa

LIVE commentary of the Magnus vs the World game



I will do LIVE commentary of the Magnus Carlsen vs. the World game tomorrow right here at 11:00 AM (Texas time and 12:00 pm NY time).


Here are the rules of the game:



* Magnus Carlsen will be based in the Penthouse of the Cooper Square Hotel in New York.

* Magnus will play on a physical chessboard and have no access to external support.

* The three GMs supporting the World Team will be located in a different location and will suggest their moves on a computer.

* A butler, present in Magnus’ room, plays the chosen moves of the World Team on Magnus’ physical chess board.

* The only contact between Magnus and the three GMs will be through an arbiter, who will assist both sides in the running of the challenge and rule on any disputes.

The game will be played LIVE with strict time controls, as follows:


* Magnus has 1 minute thinking time per move.

* When Magnus makes his move on his physical board, it stops his countdown clock.

* A game operator inputs this move into a computer, which reveals it to the three GMs and the online audience, and triggers the GMs time clock.

* The GMs now have 1 minute to determine their response.

* When the GMs propose their counter move choices to the online viewers, their countdown clock stops.

* The online viewing public now has 1½ minutes to place their votes.

* During this time, a commentary team discusses the three proposals, while the computer counts the votes.

* When the 1½ minutes are up, the most popular move is shown on the online feed.

* The butler in Magnus’ suite now plays that move on his physical board on behalf of the World Team. As soon as this is completed, Magnus’ clock reactivates and he has 1 minute to make his follow-up move.

* If all 3 GMs propose the same next move, it gets made automatically without an online vote.

* Both Magnus and the World Team are allowed three ‘Extra Time’ periods. These grant them an additional 2 minutes thinking time on a particular move (giving a total of 3 minutes).

* These are triggered by making a request to the arbiter, who will monitor the additional time and the number of ‘Extra Time’ periods taken.


Special rules


1. Violation of the 1 minute rule:


- If any player has not made his move within 60 seconds, that side automatically loses 1 ‘Extra Time’ period. This allows them an additional 2 minutes thinking time on that particular move (giving a total of 3 minutes). This continues until all 3 ‘Extra Time’ periods are used.

- In the case of The World Team, this also happens regardless of which of the 3 GM’s run out of time. This means that the same player could use up all of The World Team’s ‘Extra Time’ periods.

- If any side exceeds the 60 seconds and has no more ‘Extra Time’ periods left, that side looses the match.

2. Draw


- Both parties can request a draw at any point during the match. In the event of a draw offer by Magnus, the three GMs will discuss this verbally amongst themselves – it will not be offered to the vote by the online World Team. A majority decision by two GMs will decide acceptance or rejection of the offer.


3. Two or three different moves with the same percentages


- If two (or all three) of the GMs suggested moves receive exactly the same percentage vote from the online World Team, the move with the greater physical count number will be played. In the event that both (or all three) receive exactly the same number of votes, the move that reached the vote number first will be played.

Official website: http://rwcc.g-star.com

Posted by Picasa

LIVE commentary of the Magnus vs the World game



I will do LIVE commentary of the Magnus Carlsen vs. the World game tomorrow right here at 11:00 AM (Texas time and 12:00 pm NY time).


Here are the rules of the game:



* Magnus Carlsen will be based in the Penthouse of the Cooper Square Hotel in New York.

* Magnus will play on a physical chessboard and have no access to external support.

* The three GMs supporting the World Team will be located in a different location and will suggest their moves on a computer.

* A butler, present in Magnus’ room, plays the chosen moves of the World Team on Magnus’ physical chess board.

* The only contact between Magnus and the three GMs will be through an arbiter, who will assist both sides in the running of the challenge and rule on any disputes.

The game will be played LIVE with strict time controls, as follows:


* Magnus has 1 minute thinking time per move.

* When Magnus makes his move on his physical board, it stops his countdown clock.

* A game operator inputs this move into a computer, which reveals it to the three GMs and the online audience, and triggers the GMs time clock.

* The GMs now have 1 minute to determine their response.

* When the GMs propose their counter move choices to the online viewers, their countdown clock stops.

* The online viewing public now has 1½ minutes to place their votes.

* During this time, a commentary team discusses the three proposals, while the computer counts the votes.

* When the 1½ minutes are up, the most popular move is shown on the online feed.

* The butler in Magnus’ suite now plays that move on his physical board on behalf of the World Team. As soon as this is completed, Magnus’ clock reactivates and he has 1 minute to make his follow-up move.

* If all 3 GMs propose the same next move, it gets made automatically without an online vote.

* Both Magnus and the World Team are allowed three ‘Extra Time’ periods. These grant them an additional 2 minutes thinking time on a particular move (giving a total of 3 minutes).

* These are triggered by making a request to the arbiter, who will monitor the additional time and the number of ‘Extra Time’ periods taken.


Special rules


1. Violation of the 1 minute rule:


- If any player has not made his move within 60 seconds, that side automatically loses 1 ‘Extra Time’ period. This allows them an additional 2 minutes thinking time on that particular move (giving a total of 3 minutes). This continues until all 3 ‘Extra Time’ periods are used.

- In the case of The World Team, this also happens regardless of which of the 3 GM’s run out of time. This means that the same player could use up all of The World Team’s ‘Extra Time’ periods.

- If any side exceeds the 60 seconds and has no more ‘Extra Time’ periods left, that side looses the match.

2. Draw


- Both parties can request a draw at any point during the match. In the event of a draw offer by Magnus, the three GMs will discuss this verbally amongst themselves – it will not be offered to the vote by the online World Team. A majority decision by two GMs will decide acceptance or rejection of the offer.


3. Two or three different moves with the same percentages


- If two (or all three) of the GMs suggested moves receive exactly the same percentage vote from the online World Team, the move with the greater physical count number will be played. In the event that both (or all three) receive exactly the same number of votes, the move that reached the vote number first will be played.

Official website: http://rwcc.g-star.com

Posted by Picasa

Magnus Carlsen on Dutch TV

Chess trivia


Can you name the legendary player seated on the left with the dark suit?

Bonus question: Can you name his opponent?

Posted by Picasa

GM Cao Sang victorious at Malaysian Open


GM Cao Sang victorious at Malaysian Open
Report by GM Neelotpal Das
Published by Chessdom

Grandmaster Cao Sang of Vietnam emerges winner on tie break after nine grueling rounds in 7th IGB Dato’ Arthur Tan Malaysia Open 2010 in Kuala Lumpur. Cao Sang, GM Zhou Weiqi of China and IM S.P.Sethuraman have all scored 7 points but finally Cao Sang was declared winner on Bucholz tiebreak. GM Cao Sang performed at 2647 level and was consistent throughout the tournament.

Instead of taking “agreed draw” in the last round against his fellow countryman GM Nguyen Anh Dung he made an extra effort and finally won the battle. At the end he was rewarded with a beautiful trophy and the winners purse of US$4000 since there were no sharing of prizes.

IM Nguyen Van Huy also from Vietnam obtained a GM Norm with a 2604 Rating performance. Besides 7 others achieved their IM Norms. Worthy of mention was Guo Qi a young talented girl from China who increased 63 elo ratings only to be unfortunate at the end by losing last 2 games. She defeated many strong players and secured an IM Norm.

Final Standings in IGB Dato Arthur Tan Open:

1 GM Cao Sang VIE 2540 – 7,0
2 GM Zhou Weiqi CHN 2570 – 7,0
3 IM Sethuraman S P IND – 7,0
4 GM Gupta Abhijeet IND 2587 – 6,5
5 IM Nguyen Van Huy VIE 2426 – 6,5
6 GM Wen Yang CHN 2507 – 6,5
7 IM Swayangsu Satyapragyan IND – 6,5
8 Wan Yunguo CHN 2453 – 6,5
9 GM Smerdon David AUS 2526 – 6,5
10 IM Gao Rui CHN 2455 – 6,5
11 GM Xu Jun CHN 2503 – 6,5
12 FM Nguyen Duc Hoa VIE 2360 – 6,0
13 Wang Chen CHN 2411 – 6,0
14 GM Xu Yuhua CHN 2488 – 6,0
16 GM Das Neelotpal IND 2437 – 6,0
17 GM Dzhumaev Marat UZB 2484 – 6,0
18 IM Khamrakulov Dzhurabek UZB – 6,0
19 Lim Chuin Hoong Ronnie MAS – 6,0
20 Wang Li CHN 2390 – 6,0
21 FM Pham Chuong VIE 2375 – 6,0
22 GM Murshed Niaz BAN 2406 – 6,0
23 GM Dao Thien Hai VIE 2516 – 6,0
24 WGM Huang Qian CHN 2447 – 6,0
25 IM Lane Gary W AUS 2373 – 6,0
Total 133 players

1st Tan Sri Lee Loy Seng International Seniors Open 2010

As expected GM Dimitry Kayumov of Uzbekistan won the event with ease as his nearest rival runner-up Gross Ronald Joseph of USA is 1.5 points below.

AmBank Chess Challenge 2010

Magdalaga Luffe of Philippines and Kant Rupesh of India both scored 7.5 points and tied for 1st but finally Luffe won the event on better tiebreak.

Malaysian Open Blitz

As per the tradition of the festival in the final day there was a Blitz (with timings 5 minutes each without any increment) tournament. It was a 9 game swiss as qualification for the top 8 players who will play knockout matches consisting 2 games each.

IM Khamrakulov Dzhurabek of Uzbekistan kept his nerve until the end to win the Malaysian Open Blitz title after beating Chinese GM convincingly (2-0) in the Final. The tournament was full of drama and excitement. Perhaps with some little increment in clock timings (lets say 5min +10 sec for instance) would produce more logical results and would be much thrilling for spectators to watch.

The main sponsor of the event 75-year old Mr.Dato was present in the closing ceremony which was brief and well organised. Mr Dato Tan Chin Nam is a chess philanthropist and a great lover of the game who has been sponsoring the event for a long time and without his support such an event would not have been possible for so many years.

The function ended with a hope to meet in next years tournament in the same place.

Report by GM Neelotpal Das

Optimistic about the future of chess in India


Anand backs CWG-bound Indian athletes

New Delhi, September 9, 2010

World chess champion Viswanathan Anand is more concerned about how many medals India would win in the Commonwealth Games than the controversies in the run-up to the mega event, scheduled to kick off here on October 3.

“I don’t know the details of the preparedness but I’m concerned about the number of medals we would win. I hope our athletes will win medals in the Delhi Games,” Anand said while wishing Indians luck.

Anand also said that the row over his citizenship is history now and the honorary doctorate degree will be conferred on him very soon.

“We have set a future date,” said Anand.

Anand, an Indian passport holder who has lived and trained in Spain for a while, was to be conferred the degree by the University of Hyderabad but what was supposed to be a simple ceremony, snowballed into a major controversy when it emerged that the Human Resource Development Ministry had questioned Anand’s citizenship.

HRD minister Kapil Sibal had to step in and settled the issue by offering an apology to Anand.

Asked about the future of chess in India, Anand sounded optimistic. “We have just crossed million students in NIIT Mind Champions Academy and they play 20 games on the server.

“It’s very exciting as millions of kids are learning everyday. We will identify some talents. Five to 10 years from now, you will see the result,” Anand said.

Source: http://www.thehindu.com

Posted by Picasa

Sweating Your Way to Success


Editorial Reviews

Syed, sportswriter and columnist for the London Times, takes a hard look at performance psychology, heavily influenced by his own ego-damaging but fruitful epiphany. At the age of 24, Syed became the #1 British table tennis player, an achievement he initially attributed to his superior speed and agility. But in retrospect, he realizes that a combination of advantages—a mentor, good facilities nearby, and lots of time to hone his skills—set him up perfectly to become a star performer. He admits his argument owes a debt to Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers, but he aims to move one step beyond it, drawing on cognitive neuroscience research to explain how the body and mind are transformed by specialized practice. He takes on the myth of the child prodigy, emphasizing that Mozart, the Williams sisters, Tiger Woods, and Susan Polgar, the first female grandmaster, all had live-in coaches in the form of supportive parents who put them through a ton of early practice. Cogent discussions of the neuroscience of competition, including the placebo effect of irrational optimism, self-doubt, and superstitions, all lend credence to a compelling narrative; readers who gobbled up Freakonomics and Predictably Irrational will flock to this one. (May)

http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2010/08/nature-vs-nurture-is-there-such-thing.html

September 8, 2010, 12:45 pm — Updated: 12:45 pm –>
Sweating Your Way to Success
By PETER ORSZAG

The most important book I’ve read over the past six months is Matthew Syed’s “Bounce.” Teddy Roosevelt once said that “in this life we get nothing save by effort.” Syed shows how trenchant Roosevelt was.

Syed is a two-time Olympian in table tennis. His book is impressive for two reasons. First, he takes empirical evidence on the science of success seriously (and in the areas where I know the literature to some degree, his depiction is quite accurate). Second, he shows how that evidence shatters widespread myths about what leads to better performance in any complex undertaking (including, for example, chess, tennis and math).

Basically, we’ve bought into several misconceptions about excellence, which are not only wrong but affirmatively counterproductive.

Let me focus today on the core one. Too many of us believe in the “talent” myth — that top performers are born, rather than built. But Syed shows that in almost every arena in which tasks are complex, top performers excel not because of innate ability but because of dedicated practice.In effect, the stars among us have practiced so much that they are better at what psychologists call “chunking.”

Imagine trying to remember 41 letters or numbers. Most of us couldn’t come close to doing that. Now imagine trying to remember a sentence with 47 letters or numbers, like: “Imagine trying to remember 41 letters or numbers.” Most of us can do that with little difficulty, because we are chunking the letters and numbers. We remember the words, and we know the letters in each word.

Syed shows that most better performers have practiced so intensely that they chunk better at their tasks than normal people. So we see impressive performance and think someone is naturally skilled, whereas the reality is that person has simply practiced for longer and more intensely than others.

Perhaps the most dramatic example is from chess. A 1973 study took one group of chess masters and another group of novices. When presented with chess pieces as they would be arranged in a chess game, the masters were stunningly better than the novices at recalling each piece’s position.

But here’s the catch: when the pieces were set up randomly, in a manner that would never occur in a real game of chess, the masters were no better than novices at remembering where the pieces were. So much for chess masters being born with special powers of memory or concentration. Instead, the explanation is that they’ve played so many games of chess that they are more adept at recognizing patterns on the chess board (at least, when those patterns could arise in a game of chess).

Source: NY Times

Magnus Faces World in G-Star RAW Chess Challenge

The G-star RAW Chess Challenge begins very soon, on Friday 9/10/10 at Noon EST. World #1 GM Magnus Carlsen will face the World led by GMs Polgar, Nakamura and Lagrave. Participate at rwcc.g-star.com/.

GM Pascal Prevails in The Battle of the Border

GM Pascal Charbonneau reports on winning the Battle of the Border in Lloydminster, Canada. He annotates his game vs. Hansen and writes about dispatching Nakamura, Hikaru’s brutal blitz revenge and his discovery of cow-tipping.

Teenager a wizard of the chess world


Teenager a wizard of the chess world
By Billy Cox
Published: Thursday, September 9, 2010 at 1:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, September 8, 2010 at 7:18 p.m.

The kid who beat Bobby Fischer’s record to become the youngest grandmaster in the history of American chess warms slowly to strangers.

But put Ray Robson behind a chess board, and the shy Clearwater teenager who can see up to 20 chess moves into the future becomes an aggressive, tactical player in one of the world’s most difficult and brainy board games.

The home-schooled 10th-grader, who attained grandmaster status two weeks shy of his 15th birthday last October, put his developing reputation as a young prodigy to the test at a recent chess event in Hungary.

That’s where his showdown with one of the game’s old lions unfolded, along the banks of the Danube River in the town of Paks. Robson was the youngest and lowest-rated player ever invited to the invitation-only Gyorgy Marx Memorial tournament. His opponent — 58-year-old Dutch veteran Jan Timman, once hailed as “the best in the West” during the Cold War.

The stage was a school room with a busted air conditioner. They’d been matching wits for nearly five hours; both were exhausted. It was Robson’s ninth game in nearly as many days. They were headed for a draw.

Suddenly, Timman overplayed his position and attacked. Robson blocked for time until he could find the seam. Which he did. Quickly. He sealed off Timman’s escape routes and turned his advantage into a noose, which he tightened with each subsequent move. The game ended in short order and Robson was the victor.

But the Timman smackdown was not to be repeated. Robson lost his final game; in fact, the top junior player in Florida won just two of 10 games against his European elders.

“I really don’t like to lose, ever,” grouses the willowy teenager, still one month away from qualifying for a driver’s license.

That competitive restlessness — which began at age 3, during his family’s brief stay in Sarasota — has propelled him to venues as far-flung as Turkey, Iceland and Ecuador.

Here is the full article.

Posted by Picasa

2010 Labor Day Madness: Part III

In Chess Life Online’s final Labor Day recap, read about GM Julio Becerra’s win at the Florida State Championship, the Colorado Open and more!

Queenstown chess tactic


White to move. How should White proceed?

Source: ChessToday.net

Posted by Picasa

Romanian Team Chess Championship


Romanian Team Chess Championship
Strong chess in CN de Sah pe Echipe Superliga Masculin

The Romanian Team Chess Championship 2010 for men and women – CN de Sah pe Echipe Superliga Masculin – is taking place 4th-12th September in Baile Herculane. A total of 80 players participate in the most important Romanian team event of the year.

Top rated participants among the men are GM Ruslan Ponomariov, GM Liviu Dieter Nisipeanu, GM Andrei Volokitin, GM Viorel Iordachescu, GM Vasil Spasov, GM Constantin Lupulescu, GM Vasilios Kotronias, GM Hristos Banikas, GM Richard Rapport, etc for a total of 30 GMs and 60 titled players.

The top seeded team of CS Studentesc Medicina Timisoara, with Ponomariov on board 1, are leading the current standings with 7 match points. They had a difficult start drawing with CS AEM Luxten Timisoara in round 1. They quickly recovered from the unexpected draw by defeating 6:0 the team of CS Diana Galati and winning against CS Otopeni 5,5:0,5 in round 3. With a 4th round difficult victory against CS Politehnica Iasi, the team of CS Studentesc Medicina Timisoara stay close to the leader.

Second seeded ACS de sah Apa Nova Bucuresti with Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu are sharing the lead after round 4 with 7 match points. They started with a convincing 4,5:1,5 against CS Victoria Techirghiol. They scored the same victory against CSM Lugoj in round 2 and a 4:2 win against CS Muncitorul Resita in round 3. A 3:3 draw against CS AEM Luxten Timisoara puts them at second shared, two game points behind the leaders.

This event is the last check for the top teams before the 2010 edition of the Champions League in chess – the European Club CUp 2010.
Standings

1 CS Studentesc Medicina Timisoara 7 MP / 18 GP
2 ACS de sah Apa Nova Bucuresti 7 MP / 16 GP
3 CS Politehnica Iasi 6 MP / 16.5 GP
4 CS Conpet Ploiesti 6 MP / 18.5 GP
5 CS Victoria Techirghiol 5 MP / 15.5 GP
6 CS AEM Luxten Timisoara 5 MP / 13.5 GP
7 CSM Lugoj 4 MP / 13.5 GP
8 CS Muncitorul Resita 0 MP / 6.5 GP
9 CS Diana Galati 0 MP / 1 GP
10 CS Otopeni 0 MP / 1 GP

More info here: http://reports.chessdom.com/news-2010/romanian-club-chess-championship

Posted by Picasa

Chess trivia


Can you name this legendary chess player?

Posted by Picasa

Wang Yue learns fast and takes the lead


Wang Yue learns fast and takes the lead
Report by
Richard Forster

Tournament favourite Wang Yue (23, Elo 2732) first had a rough time in round 5 of the World University Chess Championship in Zurich. His opponent Bayarsaikhan Gundavaa (21, Elo 2460) put him under strong pressure right from the beginning. In a quiet line of the Catalan Opening the untitled Mongolian kept playing simple but strong developing moves, netting him the bishop pair and full control of the c-file. Only by the most stoic of defenses Wang gradually managed to overcome the worst. It is difficult to tell where his opponent then went wrong, but probably the exchange on move 24 was too simplistic. The rook endgame arising a few moves later still looked fine for White, but his temporary initiative proved to be worthless. Slowly unwinding, Wang purposefully took aim at White’s advanced pawn on e5. Unable to adapt to the sudden need of careful defense, the Mongolian lost the thread, then his pawn and eventually the game.

Despite the positive outcome, Wang had obviously been caught in a dubious opening variation. How quickly a world class grandmaster can absorb new insights was shown in the afternoon. In the fight between the two top seeds of the men’s tournament, facing the Russian grandmaster Igor Lysyj (23, Elo 2638), the Chinese employed the very same weapon that had caused him such headaches in the morning. Up to move 12 the games were identical. Lysyj deviated but also had to cede the bishop pair soon. In a fine display of positional artistry Wang used his trumps to gain a decisive advantage very quickly.

Three rounds before the end Wang leads by half a point ahead of Israel’s Ilya Khmelniker who is the only player so far to have withstood the Chinese’s onslaught.

While so far the men’s tournament has developed as expected, the women’s contest took a surprising turn on day 4. In the fifth round the two top board pairings resulted in quick draws, while on board three the home player Monika Seps only narrowly failed to crown a great attacking game which would have put her in the joint lead. Instead it was the Serb Ljilja Drljevic (26, Elo 2273) who, starting from position 10 in the field, first joined the lead in the morning and then went into pole position after beating the Slovak Zuzana Borosova (22, Elo 2277) in the afternoon. In a maneuvering game her opponent played too passively and was slowly squeezed.

In the end it was the bishop pair which Drljevic used in masterly fashion to earn her third victory in a row. She now leads the women’s field, half a point ahead of Sopiko Guramishvili from Georgia and Batchimeg Tuvshintugs from Mongolia.

The Swiss representatives made up ground: in rounds 5 and 6 the five men scored 7/10 and have all 3 points now. In the women’s section Monika Seps is still placed very well with 3½ points, whereas Maria Heinatz has advanced to 2½ points.

With 96 participants the 11th World University Chess Championship is a huge success. The number of players is more than that of the two previous editions combined; and with 17 grandmasters, 23 international masters and 21 nations it surpasses its predecessors also in every other respect.

Men

Round 5: Gundavaa (Mgl) – GM Wang Yue (China) 0:1. IM Khmelniker (Isr) – GM Jumabayev (Kas) 1:0. GM Lysyj (Rus) – Pitra (Indo) 1:0. IM Jurcik (Svk) – GM Nikolov (Bul) remis. (etc.)

Round 6: GM Wang Yue (China) – GM Lysyj (Rus) 1:0. IM Khmelniker (Isr) – IM Benidze (Geo) remis. GM Ponkratov (Rus) – GM Ismagambetov (Kas) remis. GM Nikolov (Bul) – Gundavaa (Mgl) 1:0. (etc.)

Standings at the top: 1. Wang Yue 5,5. 2. Khmelniker 5. 3. Ismagambetov, Benidze and Nikolov 4,5 (57 participants).

Women

Round 5: WIM Severyukhina (Rus) – WGM Tsereteli (Geo) remis. WGM Stojanovic (Srb) – WIM Borosova (Svk) remis. WIM Seps (Sz) – WGM Guramishvili (Sz) remis. WIM Yanjindulam (Mgl) – WIM Drljevic (Srb) 0:1. (etc.)

Round 6: WIM Drljevic (Srb) – WIM Borosova (Svk) 1:0. WGM Tuvshintugs (Mgl) – WIM Severyukhina (Rus) 1:0. WGM Stojanovic (Srb) – IM Munguntuul (Mgl) remis. WGM Tsereteli (Geo) – WIM Melekhina (USA) remis. (etc.)

Standings at the top: 1. Drljevic (Srb) 5. 2. Guramishvili and Tuvshintugs 4,5 (39 participants).

Live games: www.wucc2010.ch

Posted by Picasa

50 Great Blogs to Improve Your Chess Game


50 Great Blogs to Improve Your Chess Game

An ancient game of strategy and wit, chess continues to fascinate people of all types even today. Everyone from the most seasoned Grandmaster to the greenest horn sitting in a park or a coffee shop has a story and a philosophy to share. It probably comes as no shock to anyone that the internet has proven a haven for chess lovers around the world to converge and discuss what they have learned on their journeys. Whether lessons come in the form of explicit strategies or simply a snippet of experience, they all have something to offer anyone looking to appreciate the game even more and play to their greatest potential.

1.) Susan Polgar Chess Daily News and Information

This blog dedicates itself not only to chess challenges to help readers bolster their skills, but following tournaments and trends within the community as well.

2.) The Chess Drum

Focusing on the pan-African chess scene, The Chess Drum exists as a great resource that cobbles together the stories and experiences of the very best competitors.

3.) Chess, Goddess and Everything

Give this extremely fascinating blog – which isn’t always about chess – a look for information on interpreting the beloved, ancient game through historical, spiritual and feminist filters.

4.) The Blogs at MonRoi

MonRoi hosts a number of different blogs on various chess-related topics to improve games and promote awareness of the community and its competitions.

5.) Chessvine.com

Anything the aspiring or seasoned chess player needs can be found here at Chessvine.com, which also provides a great daily puzzle widget as well!

6.) The Closet Grandmaster

Politics, news and strategies collide in one highly informative chess resource for those hoping to improve both their game and their knowledge.

7.) Gambit

The New York Times official chess blog mostly covers competitions, allowing more advanced players to study the winning strategies.

8.) Boylston Chess Club Weblog

A Massachusetts-based chess club blogs about anything and everything related to their stimulating hobby, with plenty of information on its cultural significance, competitions and strategies.

9.) Chess for All Ages

Mark Weeks writes extensively on a number of different chess-related topics, making sure to provide something for every age and skill level who drops by.

10.) Chess Skills

Although James Stripes does not update his blog as often as some of the others listed here, he nevertheless has some useful information for those hoping to bolster their chess games that’s worth reading.

11.) Chess Blog For Girls

Chess sometimes sadly feels like a boy’s club, but former world champion Susan Polgar operates another blog intending to close the gender gap.

12.) Blogs at Chess.com

More here: http://www.onlinemasters.org/50-great-blogs-to-improve-your-chess-game

Chess confession


Another chess cartoon by Tony Lurie

Posted by Picasa

Israel makes it 93



Disclaimer: As a matter of fairness, I will publish articles, letters, and information from both parties when I receive them.


WE WELCOME ISRAEL TO THE ONE FIDE FAMILY!


Following a three hour marathon meeting in the Israeli Chess Federation, it was agreed to support the candidacy of current FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov for the forthcoming elections. President A. Bushinski published this announcement in the media.


This brings our tally to 93 countries!


For those people who believe this may be a counting error, we regret to inform that we have removed Argentina from our list of supporters given the political pressure from the Argentinean Government to change their vote.


We refer to the previous statement by Kirsan and his views about political interference but unlike our opposition we respect that Federations have a free will to vote as they may desire. We also respect that we reflect this in our supporters count distinct from Mr. Karpov and his team who desperately cling to countries who are not even supporting them.


This is a first in chess election history whereby a Candidate is bypassing Federations without respecting the democratic procedures within the Federation.


This contravenes clearly the principles of independence in sports and is even more shameful when he or his team try and replace a President of a Federation because he or she is not in agreement with them.


If our opposition is ready to undertake such undemocratic actions when not even in power, one worries about what they would do if they were running FIDE.


We would like to thank the 93 National Federations who have come forth to support Kirsan Ilyumzhinov and the “One World. One Vision.” Team!


We will provide you with more updates on the National Federations supporting our team as they become available!


Gens una sumus

“One World. One Vision.” Campaign

Posted by Picasa

No One Is Bigger Than Chess


Disclaimer: As a matter of fairness, I will publish articles, letters, and information from both parties when I receive them.

No One Is Bigger Than Chess
By WIM Beatriz Marinello
Former President of the US Chess Federation

Why didn’t the U.S. Chess Federation support my decision to accept the invitation to be part of Mr. Kirsan Ilyumzhinov’s Presidential Ticket?

I will answer this question matter of factly.

Back in February (2010), I was approached by Mr. Michael Khodarkovsky who is the President of the Kasparov Chess Foundation and a U.S. Chess Federation’s FIDE Delegate. At that time, Michael Khodarkovsky informed me that GM Ron Henley wanted to talk to me about GM Anatoly Karpov running for FIDE President. He told me that Mr. Henley also asked for a meeting with him. I mentioned to Michael Khodarkovsky that I could not meet with Mr. Henley at the time, but maybe later. Early in March, I agreed to meet with Mr. Henley since I have known GM Henley for a long time and I always thought he was a nice person.

The same week, I received a letter from FIDE President, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov inviting me to be part of his electoral ticket. When I meet with Mr. Henley, he offered to appoint me as FIDE Vice President in Mr. Karpov’s Presidential Board and compensation for actively campaigning.

After carefully reviewing the situation, I considered that FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov was the best candidate as FIDE President, and I was highly supportive of his team as well.

I did not think that Former World Champions Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov, both great players and important members of our community, were the best people to run FIDE.

In the past they were both chess enemies, and I considered how this could create potential issues between them, in case that GM Anatoly Karpov became FIDE President. I also thought, that their motivations were not in the best interest of FIDE and GM Karpov was lacking the necessary experience to run an organization such as FIDE.

Something just didn’t quite fit or feel right about this situation and I held firm in this belief.

Additionally, I also did not wish to divide the Americas, since we have been working for 10 years in building a block in the American Continents.

During this time it also became clear that the Karpov team was going to try to split the continent by dividing the Americas in hopes of gaining ground in that region.

My vision is for a united chess community, which is best represented by Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s Ticket and his team.

Once I made the decision, I asked the U.S. Chess Federation’s Executive Board for a meeting, innocently I also included Michael Khodarkovsky as FIDE Delegate to join us in a conference call.

At the conference call, all members of the board (5) were present: President, Jim Berry; Vice President, Ruth Haring; VP of Finances, Randy Bauer; Members at Large, Michael Atkins and Bill Goichberg.

Mr. Goichberg is a former U.S. Chess Federation President and the main tournament organizer in the United States. Mr. Goichberg is very anti-FIDE and especially very anti-Kirsan Ilyumzhinov.

I presented the situation to the Executive Board, Mr. Bauer got disconnected from the conference call, so he did not hear everything and did not vote. However, the Board took an unofficial vote. Mr. Berry and Ms. Haring voted ‘Yes’ to endorse me as a candidate in Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s ticket, Mr. Atkins said that he did not know enough, but was initially agreeable to support me, but decided to abstain, and Mr. Goichberg voted ‘No’ to my endorsement.

Acting on Mr. Khodarkovsky’s advice the Board postponed the meeting for two days later. At the time, I did not know that Mr. Kasparov was the person running the campaign for Mr. Karpov and Mr. Khodarkovsky clearly had a conflict of interest, since he works for the Kasparov Chess Foundation and he is also serving as USA FIDE Delegate.

During those two days, Grandmaster Kasparov and Grandmaster Henley made several phone calls asking the Board members not to endorse me in order to prevent me from joining Kirsan’s ticket and to only support Mr. Karpov. He even called a very influential person in U.S. Chess, who is also a major sponsor of the U.S. Chess Federation.

This whole situation reminded me of the 1994 Presidential FIDE Election, when the U.S. FIDE Delegate was Mr. Fan Adams and in a meeting held prior to the Chess Congress in Moscow, the U.S. Chess Federation decided to support the candidacy of Mr. Kouatly, but then after GM Kasparov’s phone calls to members of the U.S. Chess Federation’s Board, the United States changed their position at the last minute in favor of FIDE President Mr. Campomanes, resulting in the resignation of Mr. Adams. Back then, many promises were made but nothing happen in the end.

Now, back to March, 2010, two days after we had a conference call, we met again over the phone with the members of the Federation’s Executive Board, Mr. Khodarkovsky and GM Henley. Karpov’s team made a new offer to me in exchange for me not accepting Kirsan Ilyumzhinov’s invitation to be a member of his electoral ticket. The offer was an appointment in GM Karpov’s Presidential Board (in the event that he won the election) and full support to become Continental President. In addition they would not require that I campaign on behalf of Mr. Karpov.

I told them that I would not accept the offer. One hour later, Bill Hall, USCF Executive Director and Ms. Haring called me to tell me that I should accept the offer or else they would not endorse me and that they would even remove me as Zonal President.

By then it became clear that I was dealing with a very undemocratic organization, and the way in which they were pressuring me and trying to force me to accept Karpov’s offer by use of threats, convinced me more than ever that I was making the right decision.

I did not accept the offer, the board did not remove me as Zonal President, but the U.S. Chess Federation sent me a letter denying me the endorsement and making a statement that they would not support anyone who is on Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s ticket.

Fortunately, the National Federations of Chile and Brazil gave me an endorsement since I am also a member of these Federations.

Full article here.

Posted by Picasa

Interviews exclusives: Karpov et Kasparov


Disclaimer: As a matter of fairness, I will publish articles, letters, and information from both parties when I receive them.

Comme Kasparov, la FFE s’est engagée aux côtés de Karpov dans son combat pour la présidence de la FIDE. Kasparov et Karpov vous donnent rendez-vous dans le n°602 d’Europe Echecs.

Pour tout savoir sur cette campagne violente, lisez les interviews exclusives des « 2K » !

Karpov vs Ilymzhinov : Une guerre totale

Une campagne où tous les coups sont permis.

Extrait : Le candidat Karpov n’envisageait pas que le combat serait aussi violent. Cette plongée en eaux profondes lui dévoile les rouages les plus obscurs de la FIDE.

Ce qu’il découvre est à la fois scandaleux et pathétique.

http://www.europe-echecs.com/actualites/actualites-cinq-raisons-et-plus-d-acheter-europe-echecs-2362.html

Excerpts:

Does this rapprochement with Karpov have anything to do with his attempt to visit you during your brief jailing for political activity in Moscow in 2007?

Of course that was a generous gesture by Anatoly and one I appreciated then and now.

What sort of work do you do with the Karpov campaign?

Well, it was a little bit of a shock to see Karpov refer to me as his campaign chief in an interview he gave recently in Buenos Aires, but in many ways that is what has happened. This wasn’t the plan, it just evolved that way. I am traveling all the time and I’m on the phone constantly. I’ve been learning the subtleties of the internal workings of the federations of Cyprus and Puerto Rico the way I once studied the Najdorf. It’s a global campaign, with action on every part of the board all the time, which means in every time zone. It has been quite a challenge.

So’s busy year


So vying in SPICE chess
by Ed Andaya
Wednesday, 08 September 2010 19:46

GM Wesley So’s busy year continues next month.

After the 39th World Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia later this month, So will take part in the 2010 SPICE (Susan Polgar Institute for Chess Excellence) Group A tournament scheduled Oct. 28-Nov. 7 at the Texas Tech University in the United States.

It will be the second straight year that So, who will turn 17 on Oct. 9, will see action in the prestigious, category 16 tournament organized by chess champion-instructor Susan Polgar.

The multi-awarded Filipino campaigner with an ELO of 2668 will be seeded third in the six-player competition which also included GM Zoltan Almasi (ELO 2707) of Hungary, GM Alexander Onishuk (ELO 2688) of the United States, GM Georg Meier (ELO 2659) of Germany, GM Ray Robson (ELO 2539) of the United States and GM Eugene Perelshteyn (ELO 2528) of the United States.

“It’s a big honor for me to participate in the SPICE tournament for the second straight year,” said So, who finished fourth overall behind GMs Rauf Mamedov, Dmitry Andreikin and Yuriy Kuzobov last year.

“The SPICE Cup is one of the biggest international invitational tournaments in the United States regularly held in the beautiful Texas University campus,” said So, who is also scheduled to leave on Sept. 9 for a week-long vacation in Toronto, Canada where his family is now based.

A win is worth three points, a draw one point and a loss zero in the tournament, which disallows a draw in less than 30 moves.

This will be So’s seventh major chess tournament this year.

Here is the full article.

So’s busy year


So vying in SPICE chess
by Ed Andaya
Wednesday, 08 September 2010 19:46

GM Wesley So’s busy year continues next month.

After the 39th World Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia later this month, So will take part in the 2010 SPICE (Susan Polgar Institute for Chess Excellence) Group A tournament scheduled Oct. 28-Nov. 7 at the Texas Tech University in the United States.

It will be the second straight year that So, who will turn 17 on Oct. 9, will see action in the prestigious, category 16 tournament organized by chess champion-instructor Susan Polgar.

The multi-awarded Filipino campaigner with an ELO of 2668 will be seeded third in the six-player competition which also included GM Zoltan Almasi (ELO 2707) of Hungary, GM Alexander Onishuk (ELO 2688) of the United States, GM Georg Meier (ELO 2659) of Germany, GM Ray Robson (ELO 2539) of the United States and GM Eugene Perelshteyn (ELO 2528) of the United States.

“It’s a big honor for me to participate in the SPICE tournament for the second straight year,” said So, who finished fourth overall behind GMs Rauf Mamedov, Dmitry Andreikin and Yuriy Kuzobov last year.

“The SPICE Cup is one of the biggest international invitational tournaments in the United States regularly held in the beautiful Texas University campus,” said So, who is also scheduled to leave on Sept. 9 for a week-long vacation in Toronto, Canada where his family is now based.

A win is worth three points, a draw one point and a loss zero in the tournament, which disallows a draw in less than 30 moves.

This will be So’s seventh major chess tournament this year.

Here is the full article.


Categories